The persistence of cognitive biases in financial decisions across economic groups
Jun 1, 2023·,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,·
0 min read
Kai Ruggeri
Sarah Ashcroft-Jones
Giampaolo Abate Romero Landini
Narjes Al-Zahli
Natalia Alexander
Mathias Houe Andersen
Katherine Bibilouri
Katharina Busch
Valentina Cafarelli
Jennifer Chen
Barbora Doubravová
Tatianna Dugué
Aleena Asfa Durrani
Nicholas Dutra
Eduardo Garcia-Garzon
Christian Gomes
Aleksandra Gracheva
Neža Grilc
Deniz Mısra Gürol
Zoe Heidenry
Clara Hu
Rachel Krasner
Romy Levin
Justine Li
Ashleigh Marie Elizabeth Messenger
Melika Miralem
Fredrik Nilsson
Julia Marie Oberschulte
Takashi Obi
Anastasia Pan
Sun Young Park
Daria Stefania Pascu
Sofia Pelica
Maksymilian Pyrkowski
Katherinne Rabanal
Pika Ranc
Žiga Mekiš Recek
Alexandra Symeonidou
Olivia Symone Tutuska
Milica Vdovic
Qihang Yuan
Friederike Stock
Abstract
While economic inequality continues to rise within countries, efforts to address it have been largely ineffective, particularly those involving behavioral approaches. It is often implied but not tested that choice patterns among low-income individuals may be a factor impeding behavioral interventions aimed at improving upward economic mobility. To test this, we assessed rates of ten cognitive biases across nearly 5000 participants from 27 countries. Our analyses were primarily focused on 1458 individuals that were either low-income adults or individuals who grew up in disadvantaged households but had above-average financial well-being as adults, known as positive deviants. Using discrete and complex models, we find evidence of no differences within or between groups or countries. We therefore conclude that choices impeded by cognitive biases alone cannot explain why some individuals do not experience upward economic mobility. Policies must combine both behavioral and structural interventions to improve financial well-being across populations.
Type
Publication
Scientific Reports